AWS Network Firewall alternative

The AWS Network Firewall alternative — same egress control, no per-GB tax.

AWS Network Firewall bills $0.395/hr for the primary Availability Zone endpoint and $0.065 per GB — so a 2-AZ deployment is roughly $404/month before a single byte, then the uncapped per-GB charge on top. Enforza does secure NAT and FQDN/SNI-based L7 filtering in one appliance, at a flat per-firewall price and $0/GB — 60–80% less than the cloud-native firewall from roughly 15TB/month of egress upward.

The cost wedge · AWS

AWS Network Firewall bills you per AZ, then per GB. Enforza bills you once.

Filtered egress on AWS Network Firewall is metered two ways at once — a per-hour endpoint fee AND a per-GB charge — and the endpoint fee runs per Availability Zone (the primary AZ at $0.395/hr, each additional AZ at a lower $0.158/hr). A 2-AZ deployment is roughly $404/month before a single byte, then $0.065/GB on top, growing forever and uncapped. Enforza is one appliance at a flat per-firewall price, doing secure NAT and L7 in one.

AWS Secure egress on AWS
AWS Network Firewall — AZ 1 (primary) Stateful L7 inspection, filtering + secure egress. Primary endpoint
Per hour
$0.395 / endpoint-hr (~$288/mo)
Per GB
$0.065 / GB
AWS Network Firewall — AZ 2 (secondary) A second endpoint for a 2-AZ HA pair — priced lower than the primary
Per hour
$0.158 / endpoint-hr (~$115/mo)
Per GB
$0.065 / GB

Per-AZ endpoint-hours AND per GB · the endpoint fee multiplied by every Availability Zone, forever.

With Enforza
Enforza NVA Secure NAT + FQDN/SNI-based L7, in one
Per hour
$0
Per GB
$0 / GB

Flat, per-firewall licence — plus the Linux VM(s) you provision, depending on your availability requirements.

AWS rates VERIFIED us-east-1, dated 2026-06-14 — directional and subject to change.
Network Firewall is $0.395/endpoint-hr per Availability Zone plus $0.065/GB, both duplicated per AZ.
Savings of 60–80% are typical at modest egress; run your own numbers.

Migration · deployment

Wherever AWS Network Firewall is deployed, Enforza deploys too

Enforza fits the same topology you already run. Migration is a route-table change — point the route that sends traffic to your Network Firewall endpoint at the Enforza appliance instead. No re-architecture, no new network design.

  • Drop-in by route table

    The data path moves to the Enforza NVA; the rest of your network design is untouched.

  • Centralized inspection VPC

    Run the AWS-recommended pattern: route spoke networks through a central inspection VPC and place Enforza there. The same hub-and-spoke topology you would use for Network Firewall, one flat-priced appliance.

  • East-west, not just egress

    Inspect egress, ingress and east-west VPC-to-VPC lateral traffic on the same appliance — so movement between your own networks is governed, not only the outbound path to the internet.

Prefer transparent, horizontally-scaled inspection? Enforza also runs as a GWLB inspection appliance behind an AWS Gateway Load Balancer — see how GWLB inspection works.

The honest breakdown

Enforza vs AWS Network Firewall — including where AWS wins

Here is the honest, row-by-row breakdown — including where AWS wins. We group it three ways: 6 rows where the two are the same on the core firewall job, 9 where Enforza leads on cost and workflow, and 5 where AWS is genuinely the stronger choice. A comparison that hides the trade-offs is not worth trusting.

  • Parity Genuine parity on the job
  • Enforza advantage Enforza is the stronger choice
  • AWS advantage AWS is the stronger choice
Enforza compared to AWS Network Firewall across the capabilities that decide the egress buy — with a verdict of Same, Enforza advantage or AWS advantage on every row.
Capability Enforza AWS Network Firewall Verdict
Stateful L3–L7 filtering Stateful inspection across L3/L4 and L7, egress and ingress Stateful and stateless engines with deep packet inspection Same
Domain / FQDN allow-listing SNI and FQDN allow- and deny-lists for outbound control Domain-list (FQDN) filtering on stateful rule groups Same
Destination NAT Destination NAT supported on the appliance Supported alongside VPC routing and gateway endpoints Same
Centralized inspection-VPC deployment Deploys in the AWS-recommended inspection-VPC pattern — same topology The reference pattern: route spoke networks through an inspection VPC Same
East-west (VPC-to-VPC) inspection Inspects egress, ingress and east-west VPC-to-VPC lateral traffic Supported via a centralized inspection VPC, hub-and-spoke routed Same
AWS deployment footprint Runs as a VM in your network — wherever NFW deploys, Enforza deploys Native VPC endpoints across your accounts and Availability Zones Same
Cost model Flat, per-firewall licence — £179/mo (£149 from your sixth) Per endpoint-hour, per AZ — no flat option, meter never stops Enforza
Per-GB data-processing tax $0 / GB — your price never moves with traffic $0.065 / GB on Network Firewall, forever, uncapped Enforza
Secure NAT included Secure NAT + egress filtering in one appliance, $0/GB Secure egress via the firewall, metered per-AZ endpoint-hour + $0.065/GB Enforza
FQDN/SNI-based L7 without TLS decryption SNI and FQDN filtering with no TLS decryption, no key custody Encrypted L7 inspection needs TLS decryption (Advanced Inspection) Enforza
Migration effort Drop-in — adjust the route table to point at Enforza; no re-architecture Re-architecture into firewall endpoints, policies and rule groups Enforza
Compliance frameworks 25 framework packs / 210 controls — advise or enforce on publish PCI-DSS / HIPAA named as a use case; no framework grid, no controls Enforza
Fleet view + logs to your own SIEM One pane of glass, multi-firewall live logs to your own SIEM Firewall Manager across AWS accounts; logs to AWS services Enforza
GitOps or console Policy-as-code via GitHub pipeline, or the Cloud Controller console Terraform / CloudFormation resources, but no marketed GitOps workflow Enforza
Runs on any cloud One control plane across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and on-prem VMs AWS-only — the entire model assumes your workloads live in a VPC Enforza
Signature IDS/IPS Threat hardening on the data path — anti-scan, SYN protection, JA3 fingerprinting. No signature engine, by design Managed Suricata-compatible IDS/IPS with signature rules and protocol detection AWS
Native AWS integration Imports AWS IP ranges as objects; runs as a VM in your network Deeply AWS-native — VPC routing, Firewall Manager, Organizations AWS
Fully AWS-managed service You run the VM (self-upgrading); you own the box and the data path AWS operates and auto-scales the endpoints — no VM for you to run AWS
Curated threat intelligence Threat-hardening and egress control; no first-party threat feed AWS-managed rules powered by Amazon threat intelligence AWS
Single-vendor AWS billing & support A separate Enforza subscription alongside your AWS bill One AWS invoice and one AWS support relationship for everything AWS
Fit

Where each one fits

Where Enforza wins

  • No per-GB data-processing tax. AWS bills $0.065/GB on Network Firewall, forever; Enforza is a flat per-firewall licence, so savings grow with your egress.
  • Secure NAT and egress filtering in one flat-priced appliance — not a firewall whose per-AZ endpoint-hours double across Availability Zones and add $0.065/GB on top.
  • FQDN/SNI-based L7 without breaking TLS — SNI and FQDN filtering, no decryption, no key custody, no Advanced-Inspection hourly line.
  • Egress, ingress and east-west VPC-to-VPC in one, deployable in the AWS-recommended centralized inspection VPC.
  • Any cloud, not AWS-locked — the same capability across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and on-prem under one control plane.
  • Compliance and GitOps first-class — 25 frameworks / 210 controls, advise-or-enforce on every publish, from a GitHub pipeline or the console.

When AWS Network Firewall might suit you

  • You are all-in on AWS and want AWS itself to operate and auto-scale the firewall, with nothing to run yourself.
  • Deep AWS-native integration matters most — VPC routing, AWS Firewall Manager across Organizations, and tight coupling to other AWS services.
  • You want AWS-curated threat intelligence and managed rule groups maintained for you as part of the service.
  • You prefer a single AWS invoice and one AWS support relationship for everything, with no separate subscription.
FAQ

AWS Network Firewall alternative — common questions

Where are Enforza and AWS Network Firewall the same?

On the core firewall job they are at parity. Both do stateful L3–L7 filtering, domain/FQDN allow-listing and destination NAT, and both deploy in the AWS-recommended centralized inspection-VPC pattern to inspect egress, ingress and east-west traffic. Wherever AWS Network Firewall can be deployed, Enforza can be deployed. We show that parity openly — and we're equally open about where it ends: AWS Network Firewall has a signature-based IDS/IPS engine and Enforza deliberately does not. The difference on the core job is the cost model and the surrounding workflow, not whether the firewall does the job.

Where is AWS Network Firewall genuinely better?

In five places, and we say so plainly. AWS Network Firewall has a managed, Suricata-compatible signature IDS/IPS — Enforza does threat hardening (anti-scan, SYN protection, JA3 fingerprinting) but has no signature engine, by design; it gives you the deepest AWS-native integration (VPC routing, Firewall Manager across Organizations); it is fully AWS-managed and auto-scaled, so there is no VM for you to run; it ships AWS-curated threat intelligence and managed rule groups; and it bills through a single AWS invoice with one AWS support relationship. If those matter most to you, Network Firewall may be the right call.

Is Enforza a drop-in replacement for AWS Network Firewall?

For the common job — filtered, FQDN/SNI-based egress out of your network — yes. Enforza runs as a single Linux VM in your AWS network and you route egress through it, giving you SNI/FQDN filtering, secure NAT and threat hardening in one appliance. It is not the same product as AWS's managed service: AWS operates the endpoints for you and integrates with AWS-native tooling, whereas you run the Enforza VM and gain a flat price, no per-GB tax, multi-cloud reach and compliance-as-code. Most teams switching are leaving behind Network Firewall's per-AZ endpoint-hours and per-GB charges for one flat-priced appliance that also does secure NAT.

What does AWS Network Firewall actually cost?

AWS Network Firewall bills two ways at once: $0.395 per firewall endpoint-hour for the primary Availability Zone, $0.158 for each additional AZ (so a 2-AZ HA pair is roughly $404/month before any traffic), plus $0.065 per GB processed, forever and uncapped. AWS waives the NAT Gateway's own fee when it is service-chained behind Network Firewall, so this is the whole AWS bill — but the $0.065/GB rate is itself 44% higher than the $0.045/GB NAT fee it replaces. Enforza is a flat per-firewall licence with $0/GB, doing secure NAT and L3/L4/L7 in one appliance. Rates are us-east-1, dated 2026-07-10, directional and subject to change — use the savings calculator for your own numbers.

Do I still pay extra for NAT with Enforza?

No. On AWS, Network Firewall meters filtered egress by per-AZ endpoint-hours plus $0.065/GB — a bill that doubles across Availability Zones and grows with every byte. Enforza does secure source NAT and FQDN/SNI-based L7 filtering in a single appliance, so you get both for one flat per-firewall licence at $0/GB — no separate NAT charge.

Can Enforza protect east-west (VPC-to-VPC) traffic, or only egress?

Both. Wherever AWS Network Firewall can be deployed, Enforza can be deployed — including the AWS-recommended centralized inspection VPC, where spoke networks route through a central hub, and behind an AWS Gateway Load Balancer as a transparent GENEVE inspection appliance (see the GWLB inspection appliance page). In that topology Enforza inspects egress, ingress and east-west VPC-to-VPC lateral traffic between your own networks, not just the outbound path.

Does Enforza decrypt TLS to filter by hostname?

No. Enforza filters egress by SNI and FQDN without decrypting TLS and without holding your keys. On AWS, inspecting encrypted L7 traffic means enabling TLS inspection (Advanced Inspection), which decrypts the traffic and adds an hourly charge. Enforza gives you FQDN/SNI-based L7 control with no man-in-the-middle and no key custody.

Can Enforza protect more than AWS?

Yes. AWS Network Firewall is AWS-only — the entire model assumes your workloads sit in a VPC. Enforza runs the same capability on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and on-prem VMs, managed from one control plane, so a multi-cloud estate is one fleet rather than three separate firewall products.

Is there a free way to try it?

Yes. Enforza has a genuine free tier — one firewall with L3/L4 policy and network objects, no card required. A 14-day trial unlocks the full feature set, including L7/FQDN filtering, compliance packs, log export and live logs. The paid plan is £179/month per firewall, dropping to £149 from your sixth, plus the Linux VM you provision. AWS Network Firewall has no free tier — the meter starts on deploy.

Same egress control. Without the per-GB tax.

Leave the AWS firewall meter behind.

Same FQDN/SNI-based L7 egress filtering, secure NAT in one appliance, on any cloud — at a flat per-firewall price with no per-GB data-processing charges. Start free, no card.