The focused Cisco Multicloud Defense alternative — same idea, a fraction of the floor.
Cisco Multicloud Defense — the platform Valtix built and Cisco acquired in 2023 — and Enforza both deploy a secure egress gateway into your own cloud account, and both are flat-rate with no per-GB tax. The difference is the platform scale. Cisco is a four-cloud security suite — Snort3 IPS, TLS decryption, DLP, WAF — bought as prepaid gateway-hour units through Cisco Commerce Workspace, where an HA egress pair runs about $28,000/year in licensing before compute. Enforza does the NAT + FQDN-egress job from one small VM and a flat per-firewall price.
Same idea. We are honest about that.
Valtix got to the cloud-native secure-gateway idea seriously before most of the market, and it is a good one — Cisco clearly agreed when they acquired the company. Both products deploy an enforcement gateway in your own account that adds egress control on top of the NAT, and both are flat-rate with no per-GB data-processing tax. What differs is scope — the size of the estate each is built for.
-
Both put a secure gateway in your own account
Cisco Multicloud Defense and Enforza both do the same core thing: deploy an enforcement gateway into your own cloud account — not a vendor edge you route traffic to — that replaces the managed NAT gateway and adds secure egress control on top. Valtix pioneered that cloud-native gateway model years before most of the market took it seriously, and it is a genuinely good idea. We are on the same side of it.
-
Both are flat-rate, no per-GB tax
Neither product charges a per-GB data-processing fee. Cisco meters gateway-hours and Enforza a flat per-firewall licence — so unlike the cloud-native firewalls, the bill does not climb with every byte. On the pricing model everyone searches for, we agree.
-
The difference is the platform
Cisco Multicloud Defense is a four-cloud security platform — Snort3 IPS with Talos threat intelligence, TLS decryption, DLP, a web application firewall and antivirus, orchestrated from a SaaS controller. Enforza is a focused, flat-priced tool for the NAT + FQDN-egress job. Different products for different-sized estates.
Built for a bigger estate than one small VM
Cisco Multicloud Defense is bought as prepaid gateway-hour units through Cisco Commerce Workspace or an Enterprise Agreement — and it is enterprise-shaped, because a lot of platform comes with it. It is not a rip-off; it is built for a larger buyer with a Cisco estate. Enforza's floor is a free tier, then one small VM and a flat per-firewall price.
- Unit
- ~$160 / 100 gw-hr
- Term
- 1 / 3 / 5-year
- Licensing
- ~$28k / yr
- Purchase
- CCW / private offer
A procurement-led, prepaid model — no self-serve price; the AWS and Azure Marketplace listings are private-offer-only.
- Entry
- One small VM
- Licence
- Flat per firewall
A genuine free tier first — then a Linux VM you provision and a flat per-firewall subscription, BYOL self-serve on AWS Marketplace.
Cisco figures are its published licensing model and reseller list prices,
taken 2026-07-10 — directional and subject to change.
Sold in prepaid units of 100 gateway-hours (Advantage or Premier tier) via
Cisco Commerce Workspace or an Enterprise Agreement on 1/3/5-year terms;
Cisco's ordering guide states it is not a pay-as-you-go offering. An Advance
unit lists at ~$160 per 100 gateway-hours; an HA egress pair running 24×7
works out at ~$28,000/year in gateway-hour licensing alone, before the
underlying compute VMs in your account and any Premier uplift. AWS and Azure
Marketplace listings are private-offer-only.
Both products are flat-rate with no per-GB tax — the difference is the entry
floor and the procurement model, not per-GB metering.
The focused tool for the NAT + FQDN-egress job
If your estate needs the whole Cisco platform — the IPS, decryption, DLP and four-cloud reach — it earns its footprint. If the job is secure egress on one or a handful of networks, a focused appliance is faster to stand up, easier to buy and easier to forecast. Here is where that focus wins.
-
A floor of one small VM
Enforza's entry is a single Linux VM (a few dollars a month) plus a flat per-firewall subscription — and a genuine free tier before that. Cisco Multicloud Defense is bought as prepaid units of gateway-hours through Cisco Commerce Workspace or an Enterprise Agreement; an HA egress pair runs roughly $28,000/year in gateway-hour licensing alone, before the underlying compute. It is a real, enterprise-shaped floor, built for a larger buyer than one small VM.
-
Self-serve, not a procurement cycle
You can start Enforza yourself — a free tier, then BYOL on AWS Marketplace and the Linux VM you provision, no sales call. Cisco Multicloud Defense is a procurement-led buy: prepaid multi-year units through CCW or an EA, and — as Cisco's own ordering guide states — not a pay-as-you-go offering, with the AWS and Azure Marketplace listings private-offer-only. A great fit for an enterprise buying motion; a heavier lift for a team that just wants to try it this afternoon.
-
Deployed in minutes, not rolled out
Enforza is a single install command on a standard Linux VM — the firewall registers itself and pulls policy from a GitHub pipeline or the console. Cisco Multicloud Defense is a broader platform: a SaaS controller orchestrating autoscaling gateway fleets across your accounts. That depth is the point at scale; for the NAT + FQDN-egress job specifically, the focused tool gets you there faster.
-
Flat per firewall, whatever the VM
Enforza is a flat per-firewall licence — £179/month, £149 from your sixth — regardless of the VM size you run it on or how much it carries. Cisco meters gateway-hours per gateway, so a high-availability design doubles the gateway count and the licensing, and busier or larger gateways burn hours faster. One flat line is easier to forecast.
-
Compliance baked in
Enforza ships 25 framework packs and 210 CIS / NIST / PCI-mapped controls, advising or enforcing on every policy publish, with continuous audit. Cisco Multicloud Defense is a strong security platform, but it has no equivalent compliance-controls catalogue built into the product — that evidence is on you to assemble.
-
Egress policy as a reviewed GitHub PR
Enforza's egress policy is YAML in a Git repo — every change a pull request with a line-by-line diff, CI validation and a permanent audit trail, or the same policy from the console. Cisco Multicloud Defense has a capable Terraform provider and a rich SaaS console; Enforza's difference is the PR-reviewed egress-policy workflow on a single focused surface.
-
No TLS decryption, by design
Enforza filters by SNI and FQDN without ever decrypting TLS or holding your keys. Cisco Multicloud Defense can decrypt with a full forward proxy for deeper URL-path filtering, IPS, DLP and antivirus — a real capability if you need it, and one that means key custody and a man-in-the-middle on your egress. Enforza deliberately does neither: no keys to hold, no decryption to trust.
-
A single-pass engine, purpose-built for cloud
On the same standard Linux network primitives every egress appliance uses, Enforza runs its own single-pass packet classification and verdict engine: each flow is classified once, in microseconds (measured p99 49.5 µs), then enforced in-kernel at line rate, 98.5% on the kernel fast path. Microsecond-class, purpose-built for cloud egress and east-west.
Enforza vs Cisco Multicloud Defense — including where Cisco wins
Row by row, including where Cisco wins: 5 rows where the two are the same on the core job, 7 where Enforza leads on focus, floor and simplicity, and 6 where Cisco Multicloud Defense is genuinely the stronger choice. A comparison that hides the trade-offs is not worth trusting.
- Shared / parity Shared ground, same job
- Enforza advantage Enforza is the stronger choice
- Cisco MCD advantage Cisco MCD is the stronger choice
| Capability | Enforza | Cisco MCD | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Replaces the cloud NAT gateway | An appliance in your account: secure NAT plus egress control | A gateway in your account: secure NAT plus egress control | Same |
| Flat-rate, no per-GB data-processing tax | Flat per-firewall licence — the meter never climbs with traffic | Gateway-hour metering — no per-GB fee either; a genuine strength | Same |
| FQDN / SNI egress filtering | SNI and FQDN allow- and deny-lists, no TLS decryption | FQDN Filter Profiles — SNI/domain matching, PCRE regex, category feeds | Same |
| Secure source NAT for private subnets | Secure source NAT on the appliance, alongside egress filtering | Source NAT on the gateway, alongside egress filtering | Same |
| Runs in your own cloud account | The VM and the data path stay in your network; we run the plane | Gateways deploy into your own account; the controller is Cisco-hosted | Same |
| Entry price / floor | A free tier, then one small VM plus a flat subscription | Prepaid gateway-hour units — an HA egress pair ~$28k/yr in licensing | Enforza |
| How you buy it | Free tier, then BYOL self-serve on AWS Marketplace — no sales call | CCW / EA prepaid units, not pay-as-you-go; marketplace private-offer-only | Enforza |
| Time to value | One install command; registers itself and pulls policy in minutes | A SaaS controller and autoscaling gateway fleets to roll out and learn | Enforza |
| Price predictability | Flat per firewall — £179/mo (£149 from your sixth), any VM size | Metered per gateway-hour; HA doubles the gateways, size burns hours faster | Enforza |
| Compliance frameworks | 25 packs / 210 CIS-NIST-PCI controls — advise or enforce, continuous audit | Strong security platform, but no built-in compliance-controls catalogue | Enforza |
| Egress policy workflow | Policy-as-code — every change a reviewed GitHub PR, or the console | Terraform provider plus the SaaS console — a broader platform to drive | Enforza |
| Classification engine | Single-pass verdict engine — each flow classified once in microseconds (p99 49.5 µs), then 98.5% enforced in-kernel at line rate | Autoscaling gateway fleets orchestrated across clouds by the controller | Enforza |
| Signature IDS / IPS | Threat hardening on the data path — anti-scan, SYN protection, JA3 fingerprinting. No signature engine, by design | Snort3 IPS with Cisco Talos threat intelligence — a full signature engine | Cisco MCD |
| TLS decryption & URL-path L7 | No TLS decryption ever, by design — no key custody, so no URL-path filtering | Full TLS forward-proxy decryption for URL-path filtering (all TLS versions) | Cisco MCD |
| DLP & antivirus | Not addressed — Enforza governs network egress and east-west | Inline data-loss-prevention profiles and antivirus on the gateway | Cisco MCD |
| Web application firewall | Not a WAF — Enforza is egress and east-west control, not app-layer inbound | Built-in WAF on the gateway for inbound application protection | Cisco MCD |
| Multicloud breadth | Runs on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud or on-prem — single NVAs, one console | Four clouds — AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and Oracle Cloud — from one controller | Cisco MCD |
| Enterprise procurement & support | Basic email support included; premium support and consultancy available | Cisco EA/CCW procurement, TAC support and Talos behind the platform | Cisco MCD |
Where each one fits
Where Enforza wins
- A floor of one small VM — a free tier, then a Linux VM plus a flat subscription, rather than prepaid gateway-hour units and an HA pair that runs roughly $28,000/year in licensing before compute.
- Self-serve from the start — a genuine free tier and BYOL on AWS Marketplace, not a procurement-led CCW/EA buy that Cisco's own guide describes as not pay-as-you-go.
- Deployed in minutes — one install command, self-registering, policy from a GitHub pipeline or the console; the focused tool for the NAT + FQDN-egress job.
- Flat and forecastable — one per-firewall line whatever the VM size, not gateway-hour metering that a high-availability design doubles.
- Compliance is first-class — 25 framework packs and 210 CIS / NIST / PCI-mapped controls with continuous audit, advise-or-enforce on every publish.
- No decryption, no key custody — SNI and FQDN egress filtering without ever man-in-the-middling your TLS or holding your keys.
When Cisco Multicloud Defense is the right call
- You already run a Cisco security estate — Firewall Management, Talos, Security Cloud Control — and want cloud egress governed from the same platform and threat intelligence. That is exactly what Cisco Multicloud Defense is built for.
- You need real signature IDS/IPS — Snort3 with Cisco Talos — inline on egress and east-west, not the on-path threat hardening Enforza provides.
- You need full TLS forward-proxy decryption for URL-path filtering, plus inline DLP, antivirus and a web application firewall — capabilities Enforza deliberately does not offer, because it never decrypts TLS or holds your keys.
- You need four-cloud coverage including Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, with autoscaling gateway fleets orchestrated centrally across all of them — broader cloud reach than Enforza's AWS, Azure, Google Cloud or on-prem.
- You are a procurement-led enterprise comfortable buying prepaid multi-year units through Cisco Commerce Workspace or an Enterprise Agreement, with Cisco TAC support and enterprise references behind it.
Cisco Multicloud Defense alternative — common questions
Are Enforza and Cisco Multicloud Defense trying to do the same thing?
On one job, yes: both deploy a secure gateway into your own cloud account that replaces the managed NAT gateway and adds egress control, and both are flat-rate with no per-GB data-processing tax. Valtix — the company Cisco acquired in 2023 and rebranded to Multicloud Defense — pioneered that cloud-native gateway model, and it is a genuinely good idea. Where they diverge is scope. Cisco Multicloud Defense is a four-cloud security platform — Snort3 IPS with Talos, TLS decryption, DLP, a web application firewall and antivirus, orchestrated from a SaaS controller. Enforza is a focused, flat-priced tool for the NAT + FQDN-egress job on one or a handful of networks. Different products for different-sized estates.
Isn't Cisco Multicloud Defense the same as Valtix?
It is the same lineage. Valtix, a cloud-native network security startup, was acquired by Cisco in 2023 and the product is now sold as Cisco Multicloud Defense. The Valtix-heritage gateway is still the core enforcement engine — a SaaS controller that deploys autoscaling security gateways into your AWS, Azure, Google Cloud or Oracle Cloud accounts. If you are searching 'Valtix alternative', Cisco Multicloud Defense is what Valtix became, and this page compares Enforza to it fairly.
What does Cisco Multicloud Defense cost to get started?
It is bought as prepaid units of 100 gateway-hours, in an Advantage or Premier tier, through Cisco Commerce Workspace or an Enterprise Agreement on 1-, 3- or 5-year terms — and, as Cisco's own ordering guide states, it is not a pay-as-you-go offering. An Advance unit lists at roughly $160 per 100 gateway-hours; a high-availability egress gateway pair running 24×7 works out at roughly $28,000/year in gateway-hour licensing alone, before the underlying compute VMs in your account and before any Premier-tier uplift. The AWS and Azure Marketplace listings are private-offer-only, so there is no public self-serve price. Enforza's floor is a free tier, then one small VM plus a flat per-firewall subscription. Figures are Cisco's published model and reseller list prices, taken 2026-07-10, directional and subject to change.
Is Enforza cheaper than Cisco Multicloud Defense?
For the focused NAT + FQDN-egress job, and especially below the enterprise threshold, yes — the entry economics are very different. Enforza is one small VM plus a flat per-firewall licence, with a genuine free tier and self-serve BYOL on AWS Marketplace; Cisco Multicloud Defense is prepaid multi-year gateway-hour units bought through Cisco Commerce Workspace, roughly $28,000/year in licensing for an HA egress pair before compute. Both products are flat-rate with no per-GB tax, so this is not a per-GB argument — it is about the entry floor and the procurement model. If your estate is large enough to use the whole Cisco platform — the IPS, decryption, DLP and four-cloud reach — that footprint earns its keep; if the job is secure egress on a few networks, Enforza is priced for it.
Does Enforza have Snort3 IPS and Talos threat intelligence like Cisco?
No, and we will not pretend otherwise. Cisco Multicloud Defense runs a full Snort3 signature IPS backed by Cisco Talos threat intelligence — genuinely strong, and one of the clearest reasons to choose it. Enforza does threat hardening on the data path — anti-scan, SYN-flood protection and JA3 fingerprinting — but it has no signature engine, by design. If inline signature IDS/IPS is a hard requirement, Cisco has it and Enforza does not.
Can Enforza do the TLS decryption and URL-path filtering Cisco does?
No, and that is a deliberate design choice rather than a gap we are working to close. Cisco Multicloud Defense can run a full TLS forward proxy — decrypting egress traffic to filter on the URL path and to feed its IPS, DLP and antivirus. That requires holding keys and man-in-the-middling the connection. Enforza never decrypts TLS and never holds your keys, so it filters by SNI and FQDN (the hostname) but not the URL path. If URL-path-level control is a hard requirement, Cisco has it and Enforza does not. If you would rather not decrypt egress traffic at all, that is exactly why Enforza works the way it does.
Where is Cisco Multicloud Defense genuinely the better choice?
In several places, and we say so plainly. Cisco Multicloud Defense gives you real signature IDS/IPS — Snort3 with Cisco Talos — full TLS forward-proxy decryption for URL-path filtering, inline DLP and antivirus, a web application firewall, and four-cloud coverage including Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, all orchestrated as autoscaling gateway fleets from one SaaS controller. It also comes with Cisco enterprise procurement and TAC support. If you already run a Cisco security estate, need that deep inspection, or need OCI in the mix, Cisco Multicloud Defense is the right call.
Does Enforza run across multiple clouds like Cisco?
Enforza runs on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud or on-prem, managed from one console, so a mixed estate is one fleet rather than several firewall products. What Enforza does not cover is Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, and it does not orchestrate autoscaling gateway fleets from a central controller the way Cisco Multicloud Defense does across all four clouds. Enforza places focused appliances where you need egress control; Cisco runs a broader, four-cloud security platform. If four-cloud reach and central fleet orchestration are the requirement, that is Cisco's home ground.
Is there a free way to try Enforza?
Yes. Enforza has a genuine free tier — one firewall with L3/L4 policy and network objects, no card required. A 14-day trial unlocks the full feature set, including FQDN/SNI egress filtering, compliance packs, log export and live logs. The paid plan is £179/month per firewall, dropping to £149 from your sixth, plus the Linux VM you provision, and it is available BYOL self-serve on AWS Marketplace. Cisco Multicloud Defense is a procurement-led buy through Cisco Commerce Workspace — a heavier commitment to begin.
The egress firewall — without the platform to buy.
Secure NAT and FQDN/SNI egress filtering in one flat-priced appliance on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud or on-prem — no prepaid units, no procurement cycle, no controller to run. Start free, no card.